AXL
Price
$4.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
850.99M
70 days until earnings call
QS
Price
$3.91
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.04B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AXL vs QS

Header iconAXL vs QS Comparison
Open Charts AXL vs QSBanner chart's image
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings
Price$4.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.93M
Capitalization850.99M
QuantumScape
Price$3.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$133.85K
Capitalization3.04B
AXL vs QS Comparison Chart
Loading...
AXL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AXL vs. QS commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXL is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AXL: $4.38 vs. QS: $3.91)
Brand notoriety: AXL and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AXL: 67% vs. QS: 1%
Market capitalization -- AXL: $850.99M vs. QS: $3.04B
AXL [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $850.99M. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AXL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AXL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the long-term than AXL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AXL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AXL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AXL is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

AXL (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.67% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -8.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

AXL is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.45% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than AXL($851M). QS (-24.663) and AXL (-24.871) have similar YTD gains . AXL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 664M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. AXL (520M). QS has less debt than AXL: QS (101M) vs AXL (2.89B). AXL has higher revenues than QS: AXL (6.08B) vs QS (0).
AXLQSAXL / QS
Capitalization851M3.04B28%
EBITDA664M-392.95M-169%
Gain YTD-24.871-24.663101%
P/E Ratio18.21N/A-
Revenue6.08B0-
Total Cash520M1.07B49%
Total Debt2.89B101M2,857%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AXL: Fundamental Ratings
AXL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
84
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXLQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AXL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MIGKX42.04N/A
N/A
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R4
SDGTX122.28N/A
N/A
DWS Capital Growth Institutional
GSATX29.88N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts A
AFOIX16.64N/A
N/A
Alger Mid Cap Focus I
PRKQX7.22N/A
N/A
PGIM Real Estate Income R6

AXL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AXL has been closely correlated with VC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AXL jumps, then VC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AXL
1D Price
Change %
AXL100%
N/A
VC - AXL
67%
Closely correlated
N/A
LEA - AXL
66%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
ADNT - AXL
66%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DAN - AXL
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BWA - AXL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
N/A
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+13.38%
THRM - QS
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
VC - QS
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HYLN - QS
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MGA - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More