AXVEF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.02 (-10.53%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.96M
RGLSF
Price
$1.82
Change
-$0.02 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
133.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AXVEF vs RGLSF

Header iconAXVEF vs RGLSF Comparison
Open Charts AXVEF vs RGLSFBanner chart's image
CDN MAVERICK CAP
Price$0.17
Change-$0.02 (-10.53%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization8.96M
Regulus Resources
Price$1.82
Change-$0.02 (-1.09%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization133.61M
AXVEF vs RGLSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AXVEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AXVEF vs. RGLSF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AXVEF is a Hold and RGLSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AXVEF: $0.17 vs. RGLSF: $1.82)
Brand notoriety: AXVEF and RGLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AXVEF: 50% vs. RGLSF: 57%
Market capitalization -- AXVEF: $8.96M vs. RGLSF: $133.61M
AXVEF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $8.96M. RGLSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $133.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AXVEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AXVEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AXVEF and RGLSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AXVEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AXVEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGLSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLSF is a better buy in the short-term than AXVEF.

Price Growth

AXVEF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -16.61% price change this week, while RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($134M) has a higher market cap than AXVEF($8.96M). AXVEF YTD gains are higher at: 116.812 vs. RGLSF (36.842). AXVEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -742.88K vs. RGLSF (-2.57M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. AXVEF (1.07M). AXVEF (0) and RGLSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AXVEFRGLSFAXVEF / RGLSF
Capitalization8.96M134M7%
EBITDA-742.88K-2.57M29%
Gain YTD116.81236.842317%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.07M16.5M6%
Total Debt400KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AXVEF vs RGLSF: Fundamental Ratings
AXVEF
RGLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9114
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9631
SMR RATING
1..100
9690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4442
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9876
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AXVEF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLSF (70). This means that AXVEF’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AXVEF (96). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AXVEF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as AXVEF (96). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to AXVEF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as AXVEF (44). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to AXVEF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as AXVEF (98). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to AXVEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AXVEFRGLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AXVEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PROSF60.600.50
+0.83%
Prosus NV
AMIGY45.450.25
+0.55%
Admiral Group Plc.
DBMG41.58N/A
N/A
DBM Global Inc.
RUSMF32.85N/A
N/A
Russel Metals Inc.
RKVTD0.47-0.03
-6.11%
Rakovina Therapeutics Inc

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLSF and MARIF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLSF and MARIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
-1.09%
MARIF - RGLSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
UAMY - RGLSF
32%
Poorly correlated
-6.94%
SRLZF - RGLSF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
LQRCF - RGLSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
AXVEF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More