Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWFX
AZEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWFX
AZEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. AZEMX (24.8M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than AZEMX: RNWFX (1.20) vs AZEMX (0.28). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: AZEMX (12 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). AZEMX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWFX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). AZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.95 vs. RNWFX (31.39). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.98 vs. AZEMX (18.93).
| AZEMX | RNWFX | AZEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.62 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.62 | 276% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.735 | 18.794 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.8M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.20 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.95 | 31.39 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.71 | 58.06 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 20.98 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.55 | 135.60 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement