Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWHX
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets Z
Price$12.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.47M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.78
Change+$0.74 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.98B
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70B vs. AZEMX (17.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZEMX: RNWHX (1.00) vs AZEMX (0.57). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZEMX (11 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AZEMX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWHX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.70 vs. AZEMX (14.10). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 26.09 vs. AZEMX (8.34).
| AZEMX | RNWHX | AZEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.72 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.72 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.296 | 16.785 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.5M | 70B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.00 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.10 | 18.70 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.77 | 33.47 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.34 | 26.09 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement