Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWHX
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWHX
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. AZEMX (24.8M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs AZEMX (0.28). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZEMX (12 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). AZEMX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWHX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). AZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.95 vs. RNWHX (31.15). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. AZEMX (18.93).
| AZEMX | RNWHX | AZEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.72 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.735 | 18.743 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.8M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.15 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 50.95 | 31.15 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 86.71 | 57.37 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.93 | 20.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.55 | 132.48 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement