Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZEMX vs RNWHX
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZEMX vs RNWHX
AZEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. AZEMX (22.3M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than AZEMX: RNWHX (1.17) vs AZEMX (0.29). AZEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZEMX (12 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). AZEMX (1.71) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZEMX: RNWHX (250) vs AZEMX (500000). AZEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.07 vs. RNWHX (21.78). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.87 vs. AZEMX (10.80).
| AZEMX | RNWHX | AZEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.72 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.72 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.868 | 13.978 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.17 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.07 | 21.78 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.39 | 44.40 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.80 | 17.87 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.79 | 107.97 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement