Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZMAX vs RNWHX
AZMAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AZMAX vs RNWHX
AZMAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZMAX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZMAX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. AZMAX (16.5M). AZMAX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: AZMAX (2.51) vs RNWHX (1.14). AZMAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AZMAX (14 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). AZMAX (2.32) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AZMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZMAX: RNWHX (250) vs AZMAX (2500). AZMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.36 vs. RNWHX (19.47). AZMAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.10 vs. RNWHX (14.04).
| AZMAX | RNWHX | AZMAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.72 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.32 | 0.72 | 322% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.220 | 12.651 | 160% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.51 | 1.14 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.36 | 19.47 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.35 | 43.67 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.10 | 14.04 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.93 | 107.31 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement