Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNAX vs CLBAX
AZNAX vs CLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AZNAX vs CLBAX
AZNAX vs CLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNAX vs. CLBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNAX is a Hold and CLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. AZNAX (4.92B). AZNAX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: AZNAX (2.07) vs CLBAX (1.78). AZNAX was incepted earlier than CLBAX: AZNAX (19 years) vs CLBAX (24 years). AZNAX (1.14) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). AZNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). AZNAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNAX: CLBAX (250) vs AZNAX (2500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. AZNAX (14.78). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. AZNAX (6.70).
| AZNAX | CLBAX | AZNAX / CLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.58 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.58 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.523 | 9.696 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 157% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.92B | 279B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.78 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 17.74 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.82 | 45.52 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.70 | 37.18 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.25 | 97.87 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement