Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs CLBAX
AZNCX vs CLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs CLBAX
AZNCX vs CLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. CLBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a Buy and CLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. AZNCX (4.7B). AZNCX (1.82) and CLBAX (1.82) have matching dividends . AZNCX was incepted earlier than CLBAX: AZNCX (19 years) vs CLBAX (24 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: CLBAX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. AZNCX (4.77). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. AZNCX (-7.87).
| AZNCX | CLBAX | AZNCX / CLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.58 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.58 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.527 | 8.404 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 288B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.82 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.77 | 11.32 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.49 | 38.62 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.87 | 34.10 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.95 | 93.45 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement