Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AZNCX vs CLBAX
AZNCX vs CLBAX Comparison
Open Charts AZNCX vs CLBAX
AZNCX vs CLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AZNCX vs. CLBAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZNCX is a StrongBuy and CLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. AZNCX (4.59B). AZNCX (1.82) and CLBAX (1.80) have matching dividends . AZNCX was incepted earlier than CLBAX: AZNCX (20 years) vs CLBAX (25 years). AZNCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). AZNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AZNCX: CLBAX (250) vs AZNCX (2500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. AZNCX (0.81). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. AZNCX (-9.98).
| AZNCX | CLBAX | AZNCX / CLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.58 | 328% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.58 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.848 | 8.484 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.59B | 285B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.80 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.81 | 6.67 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.37 | 41.43 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.98 | 33.22 | -30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.96 | 95.16 | 14% |