It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AZUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCPA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AZUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AZUL (@Airlines) experienced а -10.36% price change this week, while CPA (@Airlines) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.92%.
AZUL is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
CPA is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
AZUL | CPA | AZUL / CPA | |
Capitalization | 227M | 3.66B | 6% |
EBITDA | 616M | 811M | 76% |
Gain YTD | -79.463 | -11.445 | 694% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 5.82 | - |
Revenue | 18.9B | 3.48B | 543% |
Total Cash | 1.14B | 151M | 754% |
Total Debt | 31.6B | 1.86B | 1,700% |
AZUL | CPA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPA's Valuation (11) in the Airlines industry is significantly better than the same rating for AZUL (78). This means that CPA’s stock grew significantly faster than AZUL’s over the last 12 months.
CPA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as AZUL (100). This means that CPA’s stock grew similarly to AZUL’s over the last 12 months.
AZUL's SMR Rating (12) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as CPA (33). This means that AZUL’s stock grew similarly to CPA’s over the last 12 months.
CPA's Price Growth Rating (76) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as AZUL (95). This means that CPA’s stock grew similarly to AZUL’s over the last 12 months.
AZUL's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as CPA (93). This means that AZUL’s stock grew similarly to CPA’s over the last 12 months.
AZUL | CPA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago73% | 8 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago70% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GINUX | 29.25 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts R6 | |||
VESGX | 47.51 | -0.09 | -0.19% |
Vanguard Global ESG Select Stk Admiral | |||
GMHPX | 12.58 | -0.10 | -0.79% |
Goldman Sachs Rising Dividend Gr P | |||
RYVIX | 226.40 | -2.78 | -1.21% |
Rydex Energy Services Inv | |||
ESPCX | 35.17 | -0.43 | -1.21% |
Allspring Special Small Cap Value C |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZUL has been closely correlated with GOLLQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AZUL jumps, then GOLLQ could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AZUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AZUL | 100% | +2.05% | ||
GOLLQ - AZUL | 84% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
DLAKY - AZUL | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.59% | ||
CPA - AZUL | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
ALK - AZUL | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
ICAGY - AZUL | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
More |