AZZ
Price
$113.26
Change
-$1.29 (-1.13%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
3.4B
20 days until earnings call
ULS
Price
$68.83
Change
+$0.30 (+0.44%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.83B
48 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AZZ vs ULS

Header iconAZZ vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts AZZ vs ULSBanner chart's image
AZZ
Price$113.26
Change-$1.29 (-1.13%)
Volume$157.33K
Capitalization3.4B
UL Solutions
Price$68.83
Change+$0.30 (+0.44%)
Volume$682.16K
Capitalization13.83B
AZZ vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AZZ vs. ULS commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AZZ is a Hold and ULS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AZZ: $113.26 vs. ULS: $68.83)
Brand notoriety: AZZ and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AZZ: 58% vs. ULS: 77%
Market capitalization -- AZZ: $3.4B vs. ULS: $13.83B
AZZ [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $3.4B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $13.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AZZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AZZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AZZ and ULS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AZZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AZZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the short-term than AZZ.

Price Growth

AZZ (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -1.04% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

AZZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.60% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ULS($13.8B) has a higher market cap than AZZ($3.4B). ULS has higher P/E ratio than AZZ: ULS (42.49) vs AZZ (12.83). AZZ (39.101) and ULS (38.869) have similar YTD gains . ULS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 657M vs. AZZ (506M). ULS has more cash in the bank: 272M vs. AZZ (3.04M). AZZ has less debt than ULS: AZZ (598M) vs ULS (805M). ULS has higher revenues than AZZ: ULS (2.95B) vs AZZ (1.59B).
AZZULSAZZ / ULS
Capitalization3.4B13.8B25%
EBITDA506M657M77%
Gain YTD39.10138.869101%
P/E Ratio12.8342.4930%
Revenue1.59B2.95B54%
Total Cash3.04M272M1%
Total Debt598M805M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AZZ: Fundamental Ratings
AZZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AZZULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ULS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPFI26.500.02
+0.09%
Nuveen Preferred and Income ETF
CPRA26.130.02
+0.09%
Calamos Russell 2000 Str Alt Prt ETF-Apr
MEAR50.560.01
+0.02%
iShares Short Maturity Muni Bd Act ETF
GAL49.35-0.09
-0.19%
SPDR® SSgA Global Allocation ETF
SATO24.69-0.33
-1.31%
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Crypto Eco ETF

AZZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AZZ has been loosely correlated with BCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AZZ jumps, then BCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AZZ
1D Price
Change %
AZZ100%
-1.13%
BCO - AZZ
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
MSA - AZZ
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
GHC - AZZ
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
PRSU - AZZ
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
ARMK - AZZ
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
+0.44%
ARMK - ULS
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
RELX - ULS
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
CTAS - ULS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
FA - ULS
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
AZZ - ULS
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More