Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FSENX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Buy and FSENX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. BACAX (273M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACAX (2.21) vs FSENX (1.86). BACAX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACAX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FSENX (0) vs BACAX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.43 vs. BACAX (2.16). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 215.88 vs. BACAX (152.37).
| BACAX | FSENX | BACAX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.65 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.557 | 8.395 | 102% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 273M | 1.81B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.21 | 1.86 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.16 | 2.43 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.43 | 23.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 152.37 | 215.88 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.01 | 84.40 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement