Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FSENX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. BACAX (271M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACAX (2.28) vs FSENX (1.93). BACAX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACAX (20 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FSENX (0) vs BACAX (1000). BACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.22 vs. FSENX (-2.08). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 213.11 vs. BACAX (152.01).
| BACAX | FSENX | BACAX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.65 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.118 | 4.742 | 108% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 1.8B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.28 | 1.93 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.22 | -2.08 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.56 | 26.38 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 152.01 | 213.11 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.61 | 70.46 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement