Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison
Open Charts BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FSENX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 3.67B vs. BACAX (331M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACAX (1.97) vs FSENX (1.63). BACAX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACAX (21 years) vs FSENX (45 years). BACAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (14.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FSENX (0) vs BACAX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.40 vs. BACAX (25.01). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 165.33 vs. BACAX (128.10).
| BACAX | FSENX | BACAX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.014 | 25.073 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 3.67B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.63 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.01 | 32.40 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.13 | 48.94 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 128.10 | 165.33 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.27 | 117.27 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement