Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison
Open Charts BACAX vs FSENX
BACAX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACAX vs. FSENX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACAX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. BACAX (397M). BACAX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACAX (1.67) vs FSENX (1.42). BACAX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACAX (22 years) vs FSENX (45 years). BACAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSENX (14.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACAX: FSENX (0) vs BACAX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.15 vs. BACAX (47.38). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 245.85 vs. BACAX (186.25).
| BACAX | FSENX | BACAX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.65 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.499 | 52.973 | 82% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 397M | 4.22B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.42 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.38 | 56.15 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.98 | 59.31 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 186.25 | 245.85 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | 159.71 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement