Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FANAX
BACCX vs FANAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FANAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FANAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANAX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. BACCX (272M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FANAX: BACCX (1.67) vs FANAX (0.88). BACCX was incepted earlier than FANAX: BACCX (21 years) vs FANAX (29 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FANAX (0.98). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FANAX (15.00). FANAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FANAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FANAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.79 vs. BACCX (1.57). FANAX return over 5 years is better than : 219.22 vs. BACCX (144.99).
| BACCX | FANAX | BACCX / FANAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.98 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.98 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.986 | 12.625 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272M | 895M | 30% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.88 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.57 | 4.79 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.55 | 12.77 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.99 | 219.22 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.53 | 81.58 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement