Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FANAX
BACCX vs FANAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FANAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FANAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANAX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. BACCX (274M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FANAX: BACCX (1.66) vs FANAX (0.87). BACCX was incepted earlier than FANAX: BACCX (21 years) vs FANAX (29 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FANAX (0.98). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FANAX (31.00). FANAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FANAX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FANAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. BACCX (2.18). FANAX return over 5 years is better than : 261.74 vs. BACCX (180.67).
| BACCX | FANAX | BACCX / FANAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.98 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.98 | 214% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 9.066 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 944M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.87 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 2.79 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.57 | 20.57 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.67 | 261.74 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.74 | 68.43 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement