Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.71B vs. BACCX (265M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (2.10) vs BACCX (1.73). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (20 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.77 vs. FSENX (-11.06). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 175.50 vs. BACCX (117.74).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.65 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.767 | -3.992 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 265M | 1.71B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 2.10 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.77 | -11.06 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.09 | 2.16 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 117.74 | 175.50 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.86 | 32.76 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement