Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. BACCX (274M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.87) vs BACCX (1.67). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. BACCX (2.55). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 226.21 vs. BACCX (146.44).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.633 | 12.707 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 1.77B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.87 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.55 | 5.06 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.20 | 13.21 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 146.44 | 226.21 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.48 | 83.24 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement