Ad is loading...
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Jan 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a StrongBuy and FSENX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.92B vs. BACCX (307M). BACCX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACCX (2.17) vs FSENX (1.72). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (20 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FSENX (43.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.93 vs. BACCX (4.41). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 82.87 vs. BACCX (49.82).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.249 | 2.166 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 1.92B | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 1.72 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.41 | 5.93 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.94 | 63.75 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 82.87 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.09 | 54.45 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers