Ad is loading...
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a StrongBuy and FSENX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.96B vs. BACCX (270M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.85) vs BACCX (1.57). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (20 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.73). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FSENX (17.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). BACCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.44 vs. FSENX (-17.46). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 198.92 vs. BACCX (135.25).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.73 | 279% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.73 | 288% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.052 | -7.415 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 1.96B | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.85 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.44 | -17.46 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.48 | 13.13 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.25 | 198.92 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.65 | 23.79 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...