Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. BACCX (274M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.85) vs BACCX (1.66). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACCX (2.10) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.04 vs. BACCX (2.18). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 268.42 vs. BACCX (180.67).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.65 | 314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 9.312 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274M | 1.81B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 1.85 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | 3.04 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.57 | 21.38 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.67 | 268.42 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.74 | 70.26 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement