Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison
Open Charts BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 3.67B vs. BACCX (334M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.63) vs BACCX (1.44). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (21 years) vs FSENX (45 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (14.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.46 vs. BACCX (23.07). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 152.35 vs. BACCX (110.71).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.598 | 25.073 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 334M | 3.67B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.63 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.07 | 31.46 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.53 | 60.62 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 110.71 | 152.35 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.36 | 122.00 | 78% |