Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison
Open Charts BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Buy and FSENX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 3.4B vs. BACCX (339M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.70) vs BACCX (1.51). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (21 years) vs FSENX (45 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (14.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.77 vs. BACCX (26.52). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 183.58 vs. BACCX (131.33).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.323 | 30.301 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 3.4B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.51 | 1.70 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.52 | 35.77 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.24 | 58.07 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 131.33 | 183.58 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.50 | 124.44 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement