Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison
Open Charts BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. BACCX (399M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.42) vs BACCX (1.13). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (22 years) vs FSENX (45 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSENX (14.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.52 vs. BACCX (46.85). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 246.66 vs. BACCX (177.32).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.253 | 53.332 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 399M | 4.22B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.42 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.85 | 56.52 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.32 | 59.69 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 177.32 | 246.66 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.09 | 160.31 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement