Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison
Open Charts BACCX vs FSENX
BACCX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACCX vs. FSENX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACCX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 3.89B vs. BACCX (387M). FSENX pays higher dividends than BACCX: FSENX (1.53) vs BACCX (1.19). BACCX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACCX (22 years) vs FSENX (45 years). BACCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (14.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACCX: FSENX (0) vs BACCX (1000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 60.94 vs. BACCX (47.29). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 264.00 vs. BACCX (185.87).
| BACCX | FSENX | BACCX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.65 | 309% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.635 | 50.628 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 3.89B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.53 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.29 | 60.94 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.03 | 68.11 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 185.87 | 264.00 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.58 | 145.68 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement