Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison
Open Charts BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FNARX commentary
Jul 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Buy and FNARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 867M vs. BACIX (339M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FNARX: BACIX (2.34) vs FNARX (1.93). BACIX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACIX (21 years) vs FNARX (29 years). BACIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. BACIX (66.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FNARX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FNARX (29.49) and BACIX (28.66) have marching annual gain over last year. FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 148.16 vs. BACIX (136.46).
| BACIX | FNARX | BACIX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.69 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.044 | 16.718 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 867M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.34 | 1.93 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.66 | 29.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.08 | 61.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 136.46 | 148.16 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.54 | 144.36 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement