Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison
Open Charts BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FNARX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FNARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 984M vs. BACIX (331M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FNARX: BACIX (2.23) vs FNARX (1.79). BACIX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACIX (21 years) vs FNARX (29 years). BACIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. BACIX (66.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FNARX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.96 vs. BACIX (25.66). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 151.97 vs. BACIX (132.91).
| BACIX | FNARX | BACIX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.69 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.222 | 16.450 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 984M | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.23 | 1.79 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.66 | 30.96 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.02 | 60.91 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 132.91 | 151.97 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.94 | 149.70 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement