Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison
Open Charts BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FNARX commentary
Aug 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FNARX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 919M vs. BACIX (354M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FNARX: BACIX (2.03) vs FNARX (1.78). BACIX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACIX (21 years) vs FNARX (29 years). BACIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. BACIX (66.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FNARX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 43.24 vs. BACIX (39.25). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 182.23 vs. BACIX (159.05).
| BACIX | FNARX | BACIX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.69 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.663 | 25.814 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 919M | 39% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.78 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.25 | 43.24 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.04 | 63.68 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 159.05 | 182.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.00 | 160.98 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement