Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison
Open Charts BACIX vs FNARX
BACIX vs FNARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FNARX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FNARX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNARX has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. BACIX (387M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FNARX: BACIX (1.93) vs FNARX (1.61). BACIX was incepted earlier than FNARX: BACIX (22 years) vs FNARX (30 years). BACIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FNARX (0.69). FNARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. BACIX (66.00). FNARX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FNARX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FNARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.87 vs. BACIX (41.26). FNARX return over 5 years is better than : 205.84 vs. BACIX (182.89).
| BACIX | FNARX | BACIX / FNARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.69 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.69 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.489 | 35.540 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 1.02B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.61 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.26 | 44.87 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.46 | 69.96 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.89 | 205.84 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.97 | 174.15 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement