Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FSENX
BACIX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FSENX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. BACIX (271M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACIX (2.54) vs FSENX (1.87). BACIX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACIX (21 years) vs FSENX (44 years). BACIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FSENX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.15 vs. BACIX (1.86). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 223.26 vs. BACIX (157.56).
| BACIX | FSENX | BACIX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.65 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.526 | 11.688 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 271M | 1.77B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 1.87 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.86 | 3.15 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.72 | 13.91 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.56 | 223.26 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.07 | 80.03 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement