Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BACIX vs FSENX
BACIX vs FSENX Comparison
Open Charts BACIX vs FSENX
BACIX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BACIX vs. FSENX commentary
Sep 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BACIX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 4.22B vs. BACIX (387M). BACIX pays higher dividends than FSENX: BACIX (1.93) vs FSENX (1.42). BACIX was incepted earlier than FSENX: BACIX (22 years) vs FSENX (45 years). BACIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). BACIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. FSENX (14.00). FSENX has a lower initial minimum investment than BACIX: FSENX (0) vs BACIX (2000000). FSENX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.88 vs. BACIX (41.26). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 236.34 vs. BACIX (182.89).
| BACIX | FSENX | BACIX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.65 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 45 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.489 | 47.924 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 4.22B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.42 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.26 | 50.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.46 | 58.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 182.89 | 236.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.97 | 143.96 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement