Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFAX vs GFACX
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BAFAX vs GFACX
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Adv
Price$42.35
Change-$0.32 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.97
Change-$0.51 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFAX vs. GFACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFAX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. BAFAX (1B). BAFAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BAFAX (0.08) vs GFACX (0.00). BAFAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BAFAX (19 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than BAFAX (0.93). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. BAFAX (17.00). BAFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BAFAX (100) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. BAFAX (-0.64). BAFAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.74 vs. GFACX (24.08).
| BAFAX | GFACX | BAFAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.36 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.481 | 14.445 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1B | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.64 | 5.07 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.62 | 54.86 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.74 | 24.08 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.44 | 69.66 | 243% |