Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFAX vs GFACX
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BAFAX vs GFACX
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFAX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFAX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BAFAX (980M). BAFAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BAFAX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). BAFAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BAFAX (20 years) vs GFACX (26 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BAFAX (0.92). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BAFAX (17.00). BAFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BAFAX (100) vs GFACX (250). BAFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.30 vs. GFACX (-2.39). BAFAX return over 5 years is better than : 29.35 vs. GFACX (3.85).
| BAFAX | GFACX | BAFAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.35 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.35 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.052 | 8.529 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 980M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.30 | -2.39 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.03 | 34.46 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.35 | 3.85 | 762% |
| Returns for 10 years | 184.29 | 82.33 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement