Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFAX vs GFACX
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BAFAX vs GFACX
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFAX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFAX is a StrongBuy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BAFAX (997M). BAFAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BAFAX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). BAFAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BAFAX (20 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BAFAX (0.92). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BAFAX (17.00). BAFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BAFAX (100) vs GFACX (250). BAFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.57 vs. GFACX (-0.98). BAFAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.90 vs. GFACX (3.92).
| BAFAX | GFACX | BAFAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.35 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.35 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.856 | 5.156 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 997M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.57 | -0.98 | -569% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.88 | 27.74 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.90 | 3.92 | 814% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.04 | 76.09 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement