Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFAX vs GFACX
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts BAFAX vs GFACX
BAFAX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFAX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFAX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BAFAX (984M). BAFAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: BAFAX (0.07) vs GFACX (0.00). BAFAX was incepted earlier than GFACX: BAFAX (19 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than BAFAX (0.92). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BAFAX (17.00). BAFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: BAFAX (100) vs GFACX (250). BAFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.45 vs. GFACX (5.89). BAFAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.39 vs. GFACX (6.08).
| BAFAX | GFACX | BAFAX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.35 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.35 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.081 | 5.973 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 984M | 361B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 5.89 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.06 | 36.71 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.39 | 6.08 | 549% |
| Returns for 10 years | 205.10 | 88.28 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement