Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFHX vs TRZPX
BAFHX vs TRZPX Comparison
Open Charts BAFHX vs TRZPX
BAFHX vs TRZPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZPX has more cash in the bank: 890M vs. BAFHX (690M). TRZPX pays higher dividends than BAFHX: TRZPX (2.62) vs BAFHX (1.35). BAFHX was incepted earlier than TRZPX: BAFHX (13 years) vs TRZPX (5 years). BAFHX (1.05) is less costly to investors than TRZPX (0.84). TRZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.80 vs. BAFHX (47.00). TRZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFHX: TRZPX (0) vs BAFHX (1000000). TRZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. BAFHX (5.92). BAFHX return over 5 years is better than : 46.37 vs. TRZPX (9.46).
| BAFHX | TRZPX | BAFHX / TRZPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.84 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.132 | 8.666 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 690M | 890M | 78% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 2.62 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.92 | 6.90 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.03 | 21.28 | 291% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.37 | 9.46 | 490% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers