BAFN
Price
$13.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
CBFV
Price
$27.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAFN vs CBFV

Header iconBAFN vs CBFV Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs CBFVBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$13.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$16.93K
CapitalizationN/A
CB Financial Services
Price$27.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.4K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BAFN vs CBFV Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
BAFN vs. CBFV commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and CBFV is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BAFN: $13.95 vs. CBFV: $27.79)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and CBFV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 251% vs. CBFV: 120%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $53.23M vs. CBFV: $111.19M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.23M. CBFV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $111.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCBFV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CBFV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAFN and CBFV are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.92% price change this week, while CBFV (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2023.

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($111M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($53.2M). BAFN has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: BAFN (10.74) vs CBFV (4.89). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 20.594 vs. BAFN (9.015). BAFN has less debt than CBFV: BAFN (11.3M) vs CBFV (34.7M). BAFN has higher revenues than CBFV: BAFN (73.7M) vs CBFV (42.4M).
BAFNCBFVBAFN / CBFV
Capitalization53.2M111M48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.01520.59444%
P/E Ratio10.744.89220%
Revenue73.7M42.4M174%
Total Cash4.5MN/A-
Total Debt11.3M34.7M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADNYX12.600.11
+0.88%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov Y
AEYGX31.940.07
+0.22%
American Century Equity Growth R5
JDNRX76.56N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Growth And Income R
SWSCX21.95N/A
N/A
Schwab Small-Cap Equity
RISEX11.39-0.06
-0.52%
Domini International Opportunities Inv

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and ALRS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and ALRS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
+3.64%
ALRS - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
COLB - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
FMBH - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
More

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with RBCAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then RBCAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+1.79%
RBCAA - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
BLFY - CBFV
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
CBAN - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
MPB - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
CCBG - CBFV
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More