BAFN
Price
$13.75
Change
+$0.35 (+2.61%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
53.23M
CBFV
Price
$28.28
Change
-$0.07 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
111.19M
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAFN vs CBFV

Header iconBAFN vs CBFV Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs CBFVBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$13.75
Change+$0.35 (+2.61%)
Volume$5.97K
Capitalization53.23M
CB Financial Services
Price$28.28
Change-$0.07 (-0.25%)
Volume$1.53K
Capitalization111.19M
BAFN vs CBFV Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. CBFV commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Hold and CBFV is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BAFN: $13.75 vs. CBFV: $28.28)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and CBFV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 111% vs. CBFV: 20%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $53.23M vs. CBFV: $111.19M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.23M. CBFV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $111.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCBFV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CBFV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAFN is a better buy in the long-term than CBFV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBFV’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CBFV’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAFN is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.59% price change this week, while CBFV (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 27, 2023.

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($111M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($53.2M). BAFN has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: BAFN (10.74) vs CBFV (4.89). BAFN YTD gains are higher at: 3.383 vs. CBFV (-1.050). BAFN has less debt than CBFV: BAFN (11.3M) vs CBFV (34.7M). BAFN has higher revenues than CBFV: BAFN (73.7M) vs CBFV (42.4M).
BAFNCBFVBAFN / CBFV
Capitalization53.2M111M48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.383-1.050-322%
P/E Ratio10.744.89220%
Revenue73.7M42.4M174%
Total Cash4.5MN/A-
Total Debt11.3M34.7M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
65
SMR RATING
1..100
36
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFNCBFV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MACCX16.320.17
+1.05%
MoA Catholic Values Index Fund Class
MPGFX172.861.70
+0.99%
Mairs & Power Growth
FGIWX11.690.06
+0.52%
Nuveen Global Infrastructure R6
JMVNX15.640.06
+0.39%
JHFunds2 Mid Value NAV
CEISX13.630.01
+0.07%
Manning & Napier Callodine Equity Inc S

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and COLB have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and COLB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
+2.61%
COLB - BAFN
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
ALRS - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
FMBH - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with CCBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then CCBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-0.25%
CCBG - CBFV
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
CBAN - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
BLFY - CBFV
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.43%
MPB - CBFV
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
SFNC - CBFV
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
More