BAFN
Price
$14.37
Change
-$0.38 (-2.58%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
53.23M
CBFV
Price
$28.53
Change
-$0.51 (-1.76%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
111.19M
10 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAFN vs CBFV

Header iconBAFN vs CBFV Comparison
Open Charts BAFN vs CBFVBanner chart's image
BayFirst Financial
Price$14.37
Change-$0.38 (-2.58%)
Volume$2.36K
Capitalization53.23M
CB Financial Services
Price$28.53
Change-$0.51 (-1.76%)
Volume$7.22K
Capitalization111.19M
BAFN vs CBFV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAFN vs. CBFV commentary
Jul 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFN is a Buy and CBFV is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BAFN: $14.37 vs. CBFV: $28.53)
Brand notoriety: BAFN and CBFV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAFN: 24% vs. CBFV: 28%
Market capitalization -- BAFN: $53.23M vs. CBFV: $111.19M
BAFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $53.23M. CBFV’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $111.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCBFV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CBFV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBFV is a better buy in the long-term than BAFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBFV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CBFV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAFN is a better buy in the short-term than CBFV.

Price Growth

BAFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while CBFV (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAFN is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.07% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBFV($111M) has a higher market cap than BAFN($53.2M). BAFN has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: BAFN (10.74) vs CBFV (4.89). BAFN YTD gains are higher at: 9.070 vs. CBFV (1.497). BAFN has less debt than CBFV: BAFN (11.3M) vs CBFV (34.7M). BAFN has higher revenues than CBFV: BAFN (73.7M) vs CBFV (42.4M).
BAFNCBFVBAFN / CBFV
Capitalization53.2M111M48%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.0701.497606%
P/E Ratio10.744.89220%
Revenue73.7M42.4M174%
Total Cash4.5MN/A-
Total Debt11.3M34.7M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAFNCBFV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPI5.830.83
+16.60%
Apple iSports Group Inc.
BPKKF6.20N/A
N/A
BP Castrol KK
DTRK0.38N/A
N/A
DATATRAK International, Inc.
UNIRF4.28N/A
N/A
Unibail Rodamco
CHRHF2.05N/A
N/A
CHERVON HLDGS LTD.

BAFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BAFN and ALRS have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BAFN and ALRS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAFN
1D Price
Change %
BAFN100%
-2.58%
ALRS - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
COLB - BAFN
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
BANFP - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBFV - BAFN
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
BBDO - BAFN
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
More

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with UBFO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then UBFO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
-1.76%
UBFO - CBFV
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.01%
SHBI - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
CMA - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
WBS - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
WSFS - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More