Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
Price$44.20
Change+$0.28 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets716.03M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 716M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BAFSX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.97). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMLX (100000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. BAFSX (-9.61). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. BAFSX (-17.32).
| BAFSX | WCMLX | BAFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.552 | 1.788 | -143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 716M | 41.3M | 1,734% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.61 | -3.04 | 316% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.50 | 21.43 | -7% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.32 | -0.83 | 2,078% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.62 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement