Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
Price$45.24
Change+$0.30 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets852.5M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.58M
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 852M vs. WCMLX (44.6M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BAFSX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.97). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMLX (100000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. BAFSX (-3.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. BAFSX (-5.23).
| BAFSX | WCMLX | BAFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.288 | 5.599 | -5% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 852M | 44.6M | 1,910% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.52 | 6.59 | -53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.24 | 28.23 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.23 | 20.93 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement