Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMLX
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inst
Price$45.72
Change+$0.27 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.87M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.68M
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BAFSX (23 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.97). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMLX (100000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. BAFSX (-4.66). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.98 vs. BAFSX (-0.66).
| BAFSX | WCMLX | BAFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.843 | 0.700 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 928M | 43.7M | 2,124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.66 | 0.23 | -2,006% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.00 | 21.94 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.66 | 22.98 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.42 | N/A | - |