Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMLX
BAFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 539M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BAFSX (24 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.96). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMLX (100000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. BAFSX (-3.57). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. BAFSX (-30.95).
| BAFSX | WCMLX | BAFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.99 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.295 | 3.852 | 345% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 539M | 47.2M | 1,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.57 | 2.81 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.03 | 23.40 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.95 | -7.51 | 412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.50 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement