Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs CGFAX
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs CGFAX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth I
Price$55.97
Change-$0.78 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$84.26
Change-$0.59 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Hold and CGFAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. BAFWX (7.45B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: CGFAX (0.30) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAFWX (13 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). CGFAX (0.65) is less costly to investors than BAFWX (0.61). BAFWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: CGFAX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.06 vs. BAFWX (-0.86). BAFWX return over 5 years is better than : 52.94 vs. CGFAX (33.37).
| BAFWX | CGFAX | BAFWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.65 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.65 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.976 | 15.172 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.45B | 330B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.86 | 7.06 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.46 | 62.11 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.94 | 33.37 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 239.86 | 93.71 | 256% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement