Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs CGFAX
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs CGFAX
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BAFWX (4.09B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: CGFAX (0.23) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAFWX (14 years) vs CGFAX (25 years). CGFAX (0.62) and BAFWX (0.60) have similar cost to investors . BAFWX (32.00) and CGFAX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: CGFAX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.03 vs. BAFWX (-14.32). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.11 vs. BAFWX (0.21).
| BAFWX | CGFAX | BAFWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.62 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.62 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.624 | 9.063 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.09B | 353B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.32 | -0.03 | 41,608% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.37 | 42.54 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.21 | 13.11 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 201.98 | 110.83 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement