Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs CGFAX
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs CGFAX
BAFWX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. CGFAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Buy and CGFAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BAFWX (4.29B). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: CGFAX (0.24) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAFWX (14 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). CGFAX (0.62) and BAFWX (0.60) have similar cost to investors . BAFWX (32.00) and CGFAX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: CGFAX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. BAFWX (-16.91). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.19 vs. BAFWX (3.64).
| BAFWX | CGFAX | BAFWX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.62 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.62 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.603 | 5.590 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.29B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.91 | 1.42 | -1,187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.52 | 35.41 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.64 | 13.19 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 192.52 | 103.59 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement