Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFWX vs GFAFX
BAFWX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts BAFWX vs GFAFX
BAFWX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFWX vs. GFAFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFWX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. BAFWX (4.27B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than BAFWX: GFAFX (0.20) vs BAFWX (0.00). BAFWX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: BAFWX (14 years) vs GFAFX (25 years). GFAFX (0.65) is less costly to investors than BAFWX (0.60). BAFWX (32.00) and GFAFX (32.00) have comparable annual turnover. GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFWX: GFAFX (250) vs BAFWX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. BAFWX (-13.89). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.91 vs. BAFWX (9.37).
| BAFWX | GFAFX | BAFWX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.65 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.65 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.519 | 8.691 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.89 | 12.03 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.22 | 48.36 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.37 | 18.91 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 204.96 | 117.77 | 174% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement