Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAGAX vs CGFAX
BAGAX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BAGAX vs CGFAX
BAGAX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAGAX vs. CGFAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAGAX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BAGAX (315M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BAGAX: CGFAX (0.23) vs BAGAX (0.00). BAGAX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BAGAX (20 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BAGAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.62). CGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. BAGAX (27.00). BAGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CGFAX: BAGAX (100) vs CGFAX (250). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.20 vs. BAGAX (-43.51). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.81 vs. BAGAX (-76.96).
| BAGAX | CGFAX | BAGAX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.62 | 179% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.368 | 7.149 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 250 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 315M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -43.51 | 4.20 | -1,036% |
| Returns for 3 years | -66.80 | 38.95 | -172% |
| Returns for 5 years | -76.96 | 15.81 | -487% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.22 | 106.94 | -54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers