Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs FFNAX
BAICX vs FFNAX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs FFNAX
BAICX vs FFNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. FFNAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Hold and FFNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FFNAX (2.81B). BAICX pays higher dividends than FFNAX: BAICX (5.67) vs FFNAX (2.15). BAICX was incepted earlier than FFNAX: BAICX (18 years) vs FFNAX (19 years). BAICX (0.92) is less costly to investors than FFNAX (0.80). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FFNAX (27.00). FFNAX initial investment is less costly to investors than BAICX (5%) vs BAICX (5%). FFNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: FFNAX (0) vs BAICX (1000). FFNAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BAICX: FFNAX (500) vs BAICX (100). FFNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.67 vs. BAICX (9.04). FFNAX (20.85) and BAICX (20.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BAICX | FFNAX | BAICX / FFNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.78 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.80 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.965 | 7.367 | 40% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 500 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 2.81B | 374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 2.15 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.04 | 14.67 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.93 | 34.84 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.02 | 20.85 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.41 | 66.60 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers