Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs FFNCX
BAICX vs FFNCX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs FFNCX
BAICX vs FFNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. FFNCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Hold and FFNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FFNCX (2.81B). BAICX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: BAICX (5.67) vs FFNCX (1.44). BAICX was incepted earlier than FFNCX: BAICX (18 years) vs FFNCX (19 years). FFNCX (1.55) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FFNCX (27.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: FFNCX (0) vs BAICX (1000). FFNCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BAICX: FFNCX (500) vs BAICX (100). FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.46 vs. BAICX (9.88). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 20.79 vs. FFNCX (16.94).
| BAICX | FFNCX | BAICX / FFNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.53 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.55 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.354 | 7.128 | 47% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 500 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 2.81B | 374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 1.44 | 392% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.88 | 14.46 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 32.06 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.79 | 16.94 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.03 | 55.50 | 121% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement