Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs FFNTX
BAICX vs FFNTX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs FFNTX
BAICX vs FFNTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. FFNTX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Hold and FFNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FFNTX (2.81B). BAICX pays higher dividends than FFNTX: BAICX (5.67) vs FFNTX (1.96). BAICX was incepted earlier than FFNTX: BAICX (18 years) vs FFNTX (19 years). FFNTX (1.05) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FFNTX (27.00). BAICX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFNTX (4%) vs FFNTX (4%). FFNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: FFNTX (0) vs BAICX (1000). FFNTX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BAICX: FFNTX (500) vs BAICX (100). FFNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.04 vs. BAICX (9.88). BAICX (20.79) and FFNTX (19.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BAICX | FFNTX | BAICX / FFNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.03 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.05 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.354 | 7.335 | 46% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 500 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 2.81B | 374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 1.96 | 289% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.88 | 15.04 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 34.03 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.79 | 19.97 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.03 | 62.66 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement