Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAICX vs FTTNX
BAICX vs FTTNX Comparison
Open Charts BAICX vs FTTNX
BAICX vs FTTNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAICX vs. FTTNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAICX is a Hold and FTTNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAICX has more cash in the bank: 10.5B vs. FTTNX (2.27B). BAICX pays higher dividends than FTTNX: BAICX (5.67) vs FTTNX (2.25). BAICX was incepted earlier than FTTNX: BAICX (18 years) vs FTTNX (19 years). FTTNX (1.05) is less costly to investors than BAICX (0.92). BAICX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FTTNX (24.00). BAICX initial investment is less costly to investors than FTTNX (4%) vs FTTNX (4%). FTTNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAICX: FTTNX (0) vs BAICX (1000). FTTNX IRA initial investment is lower compared to BAICX: FTTNX (500) vs BAICX (100). FTTNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.46 vs. BAICX (9.88). BAICX return over 5 years is better than : 20.79 vs. FTTNX (17.49).
| BAICX | FTTNX | BAICX / FTTNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.02 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 1.05 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.354 | 5.791 | 58% |
| Front Load | 5% | 4% | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 100 | 500 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 2.27B | 462% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.67 | 2.25 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.88 | 13.46 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.42 | 29.60 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.79 | 17.49 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.03 | 51.23 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement