BAINF
Price
$1.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
FFIV
Price
$217.00
Change
+$1.14 (+0.53%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
10 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAINF vs FFIV

Header iconBAINF vs FFIV Comparison
Open Charts BAINF vs FFIVBanner chart's image
Base
Price$1.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
F5
Price$217.00
Change+$1.14 (+0.53%)
Volume$681.22K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BAINF vs FFIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BAINF vs. FFIV commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAINF is a Hold and FFIV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BAINF: $1.26 vs. FFIV: $217.00)
Brand notoriety: BAINF and FFIV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAINF: 146% vs. FFIV: 122%
Market capitalization -- BAINF: $198.38M vs. FFIV: $11.16B
BAINF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $198.38M. FFIV’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFIV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFIV is a better buy in the long-term than BAINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFIV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BAINF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -26.60% price change this week, while FFIV (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIV is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIV($11.2B) has a higher market cap than BAINF($198M). FFIV YTD gains are higher at: 21.243 vs. BAINF (-21.100). FFIV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 725M vs. BAINF (-1.79B). BAINF has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. FFIV (826M). FFIV has less debt than BAINF: FFIV (276M) vs BAINF (500M). BAINF has higher revenues than FFIV: BAINF (9.75B) vs FFIV (2.81B).
BAINFFFIVBAINF / FFIV
Capitalization198M11.2B2%
EBITDA-1.79B725M-247%
Gain YTD-21.10021.243-99%
P/E RatioN/A24.75-
Revenue9.75B2.81B347%
Total Cash21.5B826M2,603%
Total Debt500M276M181%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIV: Fundamental Ratings
FFIV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
47
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
21
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFIV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BAINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAINF has been loosely correlated with INSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAINF jumps, then INSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAINF
1D Price
Change %
BAINF100%
N/A
INSSF - BAINF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GEHC - BAINF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
KNAMF - BAINF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFIV - BAINF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
ICCT - BAINF
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
More

FFIV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with VRNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then VRNS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIV
1D Price
Change %
FFIV100%
+0.53%
VRNS - FFIV
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.46%
CVLT - FFIV
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
CLSK - FFIV
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
COIN - FFIV
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
RIOT - FFIV
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More