BAINF
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.33 (-12.69%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
284.34M
FFIV
Price
$316.17
Change
+$1.82 (+0.58%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.06B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAINF vs FFIV

Header iconBAINF vs FFIV Comparison
Open Charts BAINF vs FFIVBanner chart's image
Base
Price$2.27
Change-$0.33 (-12.69%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization284.34M
F5
Price$316.17
Change+$1.82 (+0.58%)
Volume$4.87K
Capitalization18.06B
BAINF vs FFIV Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAINF vs. FFIV commentary
Sep 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAINF is a Hold and FFIV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BAINF: $2.27 vs. FFIV: $314.35)
Brand notoriety: BAINF and FFIV are both not notable
BAINF represents the Packaged Software, while FFIV is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAINF: 30% vs. FFIV: 81%
Market capitalization -- BAINF: $284.34M vs. FFIV: $18.06B
BAINF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $284.34M. FFIV’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $18.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.43B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.78T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.89B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFIV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFIV is a better buy in the long-term than BAINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFIV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAINF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FFIV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFIV is a better buy in the short-term than BAINF.

Price Growth

BAINF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FFIV (@Computer Communications) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.93%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIV is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.95% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIV($18.1B) has a higher market cap than BAINF($284M). BAINF has higher P/E ratio than FFIV: BAINF (116.68) vs FFIV (27.72). FFIV YTD gains are higher at: 25.005 vs. BAINF (11.111). FFIV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 853M vs. BAINF (36M). BAINF has more cash in the bank: 19.2B vs. FFIV (1.43B). FFIV has less debt than BAINF: FFIV (260M) vs BAINF (407M). BAINF has higher revenues than FFIV: BAINF (17.8B) vs FFIV (3.03B).
BAINFFFIVBAINF / FFIV
Capitalization284M18.1B2%
EBITDA36M853M4%
Gain YTD11.11125.00544%
P/E Ratio116.6827.72421%
Revenue17.8B3.03B588%
Total Cash19.2B1.43B1,345%
Total Debt407M260M157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIV: Fundamental Ratings
FFIV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
44
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
49
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
24
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAINFFFIV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REQSX23.680.13
+0.55%
Russell Inv Equity Income C
BMCCX18.73N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Gr Inv C
BPIRX14.80N/A
N/A
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
CEYRX98.24N/A
N/A
Calvert Equity R6
VCKSX10.71N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth C

BAINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAINF has been loosely correlated with INSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAINF jumps, then INSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAINF
1D Price
Change %
BAINF100%
N/A
INSSF - BAINF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GEHC - BAINF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
KNAMF - BAINF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFIV - BAINF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.72%
DYNDF - BAINF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More