BAINF
Price
$1.99
Change
-$0.05 (-2.45%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
198.38M
FFIV
Price
$295.56
Change
-$9.04 (-2.97%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.16B
65 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAINF vs FFIV

Header iconBAINF vs FFIV Comparison
Open Charts BAINF vs FFIVBanner chart's image
Base
Price$1.99
Change-$0.05 (-2.45%)
Volume$110
Capitalization198.38M
F5
Price$295.56
Change-$9.04 (-2.97%)
Volume$467.95K
Capitalization11.16B
BAINF vs FFIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAINF vs. FFIV commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAINF is a Hold and FFIV is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BAINF: $1.99 vs. FFIV: $295.56)
Brand notoriety: BAINF and FFIV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAINF: 10% vs. FFIV: 82%
Market capitalization -- BAINF: $198.38M vs. FFIV: $11.16B
BAINF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $198.38M. FFIV’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIV’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFIV’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFIV is a better buy in the long-term than BAINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFIV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BAINF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FFIV (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIV is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIV($11.2B) has a higher market cap than BAINF($198M). FFIV YTD gains are higher at: 17.533 vs. BAINF (-2.599). FFIV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 725M vs. BAINF (-1.79B). BAINF has more cash in the bank: 21.5B vs. FFIV (826M). FFIV has less debt than BAINF: FFIV (276M) vs BAINF (500M). BAINF has higher revenues than FFIV: BAINF (9.75B) vs FFIV (2.81B).
BAINFFFIVBAINF / FFIV
Capitalization198M11.2B2%
EBITDA-1.79B725M-247%
Gain YTD-2.59917.533-15%
P/E RatioN/A24.75-
Revenue9.75B2.81B347%
Total Cash21.5B826M2,603%
Total Debt500M276M181%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIV: Fundamental Ratings
FFIV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22
SMR RATING
1..100
47
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
29
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFIV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFIV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CORP96.190.29
+0.30%
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bd ETF
NUSI53.56N/A
N/A
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hdg Eq Inc ETF
MARB19.99-0.01
-0.07%
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
SCHD28.21-0.11
-0.39%
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF™
IZRL24.14-0.68
-2.72%
ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF

BAINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAINF has been loosely correlated with INSSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAINF jumps, then INSSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAINF
1D Price
Change %
BAINF100%
N/A
INSSF - BAINF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GEHC - BAINF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
KNAMF - BAINF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFIV - BAINF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
ICCT - BAINF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.21%
More

FFIV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIV
1D Price
Change %
FFIV100%
-2.97%
CLSK - FFIV
52%
Loosely correlated
-8.05%
CVLT - FFIV
49%
Loosely correlated
-7.72%
COIN - FFIV
49%
Loosely correlated
-8.27%
RIOT - FFIV
48%
Loosely correlated
-9.83%
TENB - FFIV
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More