Advertisement
ADSK vs FFIV
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autodesk (ADSK) vs. F5 (FFIV) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- F5 (FFIV) has delivered stronger year-to-date (YTD) gains of approximately 26.6% compared to Autodesk's (ADSK) 17.5%, reflecting robust recent momentum.
- FFIV recently exceeded Q2 earnings expectations with strong revenue growth and raised full-year guidance, driving positive sentiment shifts.
- ADSK benefits from AI tailwinds in design software but shows higher volatility with a beta of 1.43 versus FFIV's 0.93.
- Valuation contrasts highlight FFIV's lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 26.5 compared to ADSK's 46.7, suggesting relative affordability.
- Both stocks operate in the tech sector, but FFIV's focus on multicloud security aligns with rising AI infrastructure demands.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines Autodesk (ADSK) and F5 (FFIV), two prominent players in the technology software space. ADSK specializes in design and engineering tools, while FFIV provides multicloud application security solutions. Investors and traders interested in software stocks may find value in assessing their relative performance amid evolving market conditions, including AI-driven growth and sector volatility. By analyzing recent momentum, valuations, and business drivers, this article highlights key contrasts to inform portfolio positioning decisions in the current environment.
ADSK Overview and Recent Performance
Autodesk (ADSK), headquartered in San Francisco, develops 3D design, engineering, and entertainment software solutions, including AutoCAD and Revit, serving industries like architecture and manufacturing. The company has transitioned to a subscription-based cloud model, generating over 64% of revenue internationally.
In recent market activity, ADSK shares have exhibited volatility, with a recent uptick pushing the price around $244 amid broader tech sector fluctuations. Year-to-date gains stand at about 17.5%, supported by AI integration prospects and durable growth outlook. Sentiment has been influenced by board additions, governance discussions, and anticipation for upcoming quarterly results. However, the stock has underperformed the market in some recent weeks, trading within a 52-week range of $214 to $329, with a market cap near $52 billion.
FFIV Overview and Recent Performance
F5 (FFIV), based in Seattle, offers multicloud application security and delivery platforms, including NGINX and BIG-IP products, enabling secure app deployment across environments. It partners with major cloud providers like AWS and Azure, targeting enterprises and service providers.
Recent weeks have seen FFIV shares advance strongly to around $323 following a Q2 earnings beat, with revenue of $812 million surpassing estimates and non-GAAP earnings per share (EPS) of $3.90. The company raised full-year guidance, citing systems strength and AI-related opportunities, contributing to YTD returns of roughly 26.6%. Trading in a 52-week range of $224 to $346 with a $18 billion market cap, sentiment reflects optimism despite competitive pressures.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates over 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, spotlighting those best suited to current market volatility across sectors like semiconductors, data centers, and industrials. These bots employ diverse strategies—such as AI/ML pattern recognition, swing trading, and multi-agent systems—with timeframes from 15 minutes to 49 days. Performance stats include annualized returns ranging from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, often outperforming the S&P 500 through real-time signals and risk controls like take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors. Traders can copy these bots for automated execution on thousands of tickers. Explore the page to identify bots aligning with your style and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Autodesk (ADSK) and F5 (FFIV) both leverage subscription models in software but differ in focus: ADSK drives growth via design tools for AEC (architecture, engineering, construction) and media, while FFIV emphasizes security for multicloud apps amid rising cyber threats.
Recent momentum favors FFIV with earnings beats and guidance hikes versus ADSK's mixed volatility. Valuation trade-offs include FFIV's more attractive P/E and lower beta for stability, though ADSK offers higher EPS growth potential. Risk factors involve competition and economic sensitivity for both, with FFIV showing stronger cash flow. Market sentiment tilts toward FFIV's AI infrastructure exposure in recent activity.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward F5 (FFIV) based on superior recent trend consistency, earnings momentum, raised guidance, and relative valuation strength. While ADSK holds long-term appeal through AI-enhanced design tools, FFIV's stability and sector catalysts position it more favorably in the near term, though market shifts could alter this outlook.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADSK is a StrongBuy and FFIV is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ADSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FFIV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFIV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FFIV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -13.71% price change this week, while FFIV (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +9.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.59%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
FFIV is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.21% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (+9.40% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| ADSK | FFIV | ADSK / FFIV | |
| Capitalization | 41.9B | 22.4B | 187% |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | 905M | 257% |
| Gain YTD | -32.965 | 55.199 | -60% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.99 | 32.53 | 89% |
| Revenue | 7.51B | 3.23B | 233% |
| Total Cash | 2.92B | 1.44B | 203% |
| Total Debt | 2.72B | 260M | 1,048% |
ADSK | FFIV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 46 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFIV's Valuation (55) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as ADSK (76) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADSK (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew significantly faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FFIV (46) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADSK (65) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADSK (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | FFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
FFIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFIV | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| SHOP - FFIV | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| ADSK - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| CDNS - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| CVLT - FFIV | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| CRM - FFIV | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||