Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FBFRX
BALCX vs FBFRX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FBFRX
BALCX vs FBFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FBFRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Hold and FBFRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FBFRX (3.46B). FBFRX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FBFRX (4.60) vs BALCX (1.16). BALCX was incepted earlier than FBFRX: BALCX (25 years) vs FBFRX (13 years). BALCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FBFRX (0.59). BALCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBFRX (42.27). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFRX: BALCX (250) vs FBFRX (1000000). FBFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. BALCX (11.76). BALCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.99 vs. FBFRX (22.75).
| BALCX | FBFRX | BALCX / FBFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.59 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.59 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.604 | 8.219 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 3.46B | 8,191% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 4.60 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 12.63 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.83 | 32.67 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.99 | 22.75 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.16 | 60.15 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers