Ad is loading...
BALCX vs FCISX
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FCISX
American Funds American Balanced C
Price$33.19
Change+$1.61 (+5.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets217.49B
Franklin Income C
Price$2.34
Change+$0.07 (+3.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.49B
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FCISX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Buy and FCISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 217B vs. FCISX (68.5B). FCISX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FCISX (4.94) vs BALCX (1.28). BALCX was incepted earlier than FCISX: BALCX (24 years) vs FCISX (30 years). BALCX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.12). BALCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. FCISX (49.72). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: BALCX (250) vs FCISX (1000). FCISX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.63 vs. BALCX (-4.30). FCISX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. BALCX (26.21).
| BALCX | FCISX | BALCX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.11 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.12 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.130 | -4.246 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 217B | 68.5B | 317% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 4.94 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.30 | 0.63 | -683% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.18 | 2.24 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 36.95 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.21 | 37.51 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...