Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FCISX
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FCISX
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FCISX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Buy and FCISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FCISX (79.7B). FCISX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FCISX (4.65) vs BALCX (1.14). BALCX was incepted earlier than FCISX: BALCX (25 years) vs FCISX (31 years). BALCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.11). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALCX (50.00). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: BALCX (250) vs FCISX (1000). BALCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.30 vs. FCISX (10.34). BALCX (29.99) and FCISX (28.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BALCX | FCISX | BALCX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.876 | 5.197 | 171% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 79.7B | 361% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 4.65 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.30 | 10.34 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.03 | 30.38 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.99 | 28.63 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.31 | 78.44 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers