Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FCISX
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FCISX
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FCISX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Hold and FCISX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FCISX (80.4B). FCISX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FCISX (4.59) vs BALCX (1.14). BALCX was incepted earlier than FCISX: BALCX (25 years) vs FCISX (31 years). BALCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.11). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALCX (50.00). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: BALCX (250) vs FCISX (1000). FCISX (9.83) and BALCX (9.56) have marching annual gain over last year. FCISX return over 5 years is better than : 29.29 vs. BALCX (27.55).
| BALCX | FCISX | BALCX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.254 | 6.832 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 80.4B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 4.59 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.56 | 9.83 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.79 | 33.02 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.55 | 29.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.67 | 74.82 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers