Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FCISX
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FCISX
BALCX vs FCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FCISX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Buy and FCISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FCISX (80.6B). FCISX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FCISX (4.64) vs BALCX (1.16). BALCX was incepted earlier than FCISX: BALCX (25 years) vs FCISX (31 years). BALCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.11). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALCX (50.00). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: BALCX (250) vs FCISX (1000). BALCX (10.95) and FCISX (10.70) have marching annual gain over last year. BALCX (29.47) and FCISX (29.19) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BALCX | FCISX | BALCX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.11 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.901 | 6.824 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 80.6B | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 4.64 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 10.70 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.04 | 32.99 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 29.19 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.12 | 75.99 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers