Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FFCMX
BALCX vs FFCMX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FFCMX
BALCX vs FFCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FFCMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Hold and FFCMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FFCMX (10.9B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FFCMX (1.23) vs BALCX (1.16). BALCX was incepted earlier than FFCMX: BALCX (25 years) vs FFCMX (20 years). FFCMX (1.60) is less costly to investors than BALCX (1.30). BALCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFCMX (25.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BALCX: FFCMX (0) vs BALCX (250). BALCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.84 vs. FFCMX (13.32). BALCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.27 vs. FFCMX (14.31).
| BALCX | FFCMX | BALCX / FFCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.57 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.60 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 8.105 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 10.9B | 2,560% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.23 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 13.32 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.32 | 30.94 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.27 | 14.31 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.17 | 52.46 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement