Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FKINX
BALCX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FKINX
BALCX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FKINX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Hold and FKINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FKINX (79.4B). FKINX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FKINX (5.18) vs BALCX (1.16). BALCX was incepted earlier than FKINX: BALCX (25 years) vs FKINX (78 years). BALCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.61). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALCX (50.00). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: BALCX (250) vs FKINX (1000). BALCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.47 vs. FKINX (11.62). FKINX (31.89) and BALCX (30.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BALCX | FKINX | BALCX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.61 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.61 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.498 | 4.746 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 79.4B | 363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 5.18 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.47 | 11.62 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.55 | 32.05 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.38 | 31.89 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.70 | 85.38 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement