Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FKINX
BALCX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FKINX
BALCX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FKINX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Hold and FKINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FKINX (79.8B). FKINX pays higher dividends than BALCX: FKINX (5.18) vs BALCX (1.16). BALCX was incepted earlier than FKINX: BALCX (25 years) vs FKINX (78 years). BALCX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.61). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALCX (50.00). BALCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: BALCX (250) vs FKINX (1000). BALCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.84 vs. FKINX (14.43). BALCX (31.27) and FKINX (30.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BALCX | FKINX | BALCX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.61 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.61 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 5.157 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 79.8B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 5.18 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 14.43 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.32 | 33.74 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.27 | 30.84 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.17 | 88.35 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement