Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FSCNX
BALCX vs FSCNX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FSCNX
BALCX vs FSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FSCNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Hold and FSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSCNX (5.61B). BALCX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: BALCX (1.16) vs FSCNX (0.89). BALCX was incepted earlier than FSCNX: BALCX (25 years) vs FSCNX (19 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than BALCX (1.30). BALCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BALCX: FSCNX (0) vs BALCX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.21 vs. BALCX (15.81). BALCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.93 vs. FSCNX (23.36).
| BALCX | FSCNX | BALCX / FSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.70 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.011 | 9.916 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.89 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 17.21 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.11 | 38.89 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.93 | 23.36 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.43 | 83.43 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers