Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALCX vs FSCNX
BALCX vs FSCNX Comparison
Open Charts BALCX vs FSCNX
BALCX vs FSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALCX vs. FSCNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALCX is a Hold and FSCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FSCNX (5.61B). BALCX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: BALCX (1.16) vs FSCNX (0.89). BALCX was incepted earlier than FSCNX: BALCX (25 years) vs FSCNX (19 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than BALCX (1.30). BALCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BALCX: FSCNX (0) vs BALCX (250). FSCNX (17.37) and BALCX (16.84) have marching annual gain over last year. BALCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.27 vs. FSCNX (23.78).
| BALCX | FSCNX | BALCX / FSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.70 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 9.438 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 5.61B | 4,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.89 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 17.37 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.32 | 38.59 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.27 | 23.78 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.17 | 78.53 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement