Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs FBMCX
BALFX vs FBMCX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs FBMCX
BALFX vs FBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. FBMCX commentary
Jul 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Hold and FBMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBMCX (3.43B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than BALFX: FBMCX (3.61) vs BALFX (1.75). BALFX was incepted earlier than FBMCX: BALFX (25 years) vs FBMCX (20 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBMCX (42.27). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: BALFX (250) vs FBMCX (1000). BALFX (12.04) and FBMCX (11.46) have marching annual gain over last year. BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.94 vs. FBMCX (16.81).
| BALFX | FBMCX | BALFX / FBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.66 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.66 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.507 | 5.817 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 3.43B | 8,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 3.61 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.04 | 11.46 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.24 | 23.44 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.94 | 16.81 | 202% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.15 | 47.00 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers