Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs FCISX
BALFX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs FCISX
BALFX vs FCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. FCISX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Hold and FCISX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FCISX (80.4B). FCISX pays higher dividends than BALFX: FCISX (4.59) vs BALFX (1.76). BALFX was incepted earlier than FCISX: BALFX (25 years) vs FCISX (31 years). FCISX (1.11) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALFX (50.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: BALFX (250) vs FCISX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. FCISX (9.83). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.43 vs. FCISX (29.29).
| BALFX | FCISX | BALFX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.11 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.11 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.741 | 6.832 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 80.4B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 4.59 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | 9.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.81 | 33.02 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.43 | 29.29 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.27 | 74.82 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers