Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs FKINX
BALFX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs FKINX
BALFX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. FKINX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Buy and FKINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FKINX (80.2B). FKINX pays higher dividends than BALFX: FKINX (5.22) vs BALFX (1.78). BALFX was incepted earlier than FKINX: BALFX (25 years) vs FKINX (78 years). BALFX (0.61) and FKINX (0.61) have similar cost to investors . FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALFX (50.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: BALFX (250) vs FKINX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.71 vs. FKINX (12.00). BALFX (33.68) and FKINX (32.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BALFX | FKINX | BALFX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.225 | 6.507 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 80.2B | 359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 5.22 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.71 | 12.00 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.97 | 33.61 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.68 | 32.06 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.36 | 82.96 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement