Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs FKINX
BALFX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs FKINX
BALFX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. FKINX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Hold and FKINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FKINX (79.8B). FKINX pays higher dividends than BALFX: FKINX (5.18) vs BALFX (1.75). BALFX was incepted earlier than FKINX: BALFX (25 years) vs FKINX (78 years). BALFX (0.61) and FKINX (0.61) have similar cost to investors . FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALFX (50.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: BALFX (250) vs FKINX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. FKINX (14.43). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.27 vs. FKINX (30.84).
| BALFX | FKINX | BALFX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.673 | 5.157 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 79.8B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 5.18 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | 14.43 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.43 | 33.74 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.27 | 30.84 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.79 | 88.35 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement