Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs FKINX
BALFX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs FKINX
BALFX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. FKINX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Hold and FKINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FKINX (79.4B). FKINX pays higher dividends than BALFX: FKINX (5.19) vs BALFX (1.76). BALFX was incepted earlier than FKINX: BALFX (26 years) vs FKINX (78 years). BALFX (0.61) and FKINX (0.61) have similar cost to investors . FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. BALFX (50.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: BALFX (250) vs FKINX (1000). FKINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. BALFX (5.90). FKINX return over 5 years is better than : 32.71 vs. BALFX (31.07).
| BALFX | FKINX | BALFX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.61 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.925 | 6.143 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 79.4B | 359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 5.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.90 | 8.87 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.16 | 34.30 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.07 | 32.71 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.00 | 83.48 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers