Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WFAIX
BALFX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WFAIX
BALFX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WFAIX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WFAIX (1.18B). BALFX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: BALFX (1.76) vs WFAIX (0.96). BALFX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: BALFX (26 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). WFAIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: BALFX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.21 vs. WFAIX (-2.47). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.22 vs. WFAIX (-5.97).
| BALFX | WFAIX | BALFX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.90 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.01 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.225 | 6.163 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.18B | 24,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 0.96 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.21 | -2.47 | -210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.92 | 9.92 | 402% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.22 | -5.97 | -506% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.81 | 47.19 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement