Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALFX vs WMBLX
BALFX vs WMBLX Comparison
Open Charts BALFX vs WMBLX
BALFX vs WMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALFX vs. WMBLX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALFX is a Hold and WMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WMBLX (103M). BALFX pays higher dividends than WMBLX: BALFX (1.75) vs WMBLX (1.52). BALFX was incepted earlier than WMBLX: BALFX (25 years) vs WMBLX (28 years). WMBLX (1.29) is less costly to investors than BALFX (0.61). BALFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMBLX (22.00). BALFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMBLX: BALFX (250) vs WMBLX (1000). BALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. WMBLX (12.46). BALFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.20 vs. WMBLX (7.15).
| BALFX | WMBLX | BALFX / WMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.29 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.29 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.655 | 8.756 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 103M | 279,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.52 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 12.46 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.57 | 17.72 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.20 | 7.15 | 464% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.97 | 43.34 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement