Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BALPX vs WCFRX
BALPX vs WCFRX Comparison
Open Charts BALPX vs WCFRX
BALPX vs WCFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BALPX vs. WCFRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALPX is a Buy and WCFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BALPX has more cash in the bank: 4.91B vs. WCFRX (83M). WCFRX pays higher dividends than BALPX: WCFRX (6.55) vs BALPX (3.34). BALPX was incepted earlier than WCFRX: BALPX (19 years) vs WCFRX (8 years). WCFRX (1.66) and BALPX (1.60) have similar cost to investors . WCFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 126.00 vs. BALPX (81.00). WCFRX (6%) and BALPX (5%) have equivalent initial investment costs. BALPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCFRX: BALPX (1000) vs WCFRX (2500). BALPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.03 vs. WCFRX (2.51). BALPX return over 5 years is better than : 11.15 vs. WCFRX (4.30).
| BALPX | WCFRX | BALPX / WCFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.66 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.66 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.026 | 1.177 | 172% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 95% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.91B | 83M | 5,917% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.34 | 6.55 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.03 | 2.51 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 16.96 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.15 | 4.30 | 259% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement