Advertisement
BALY vs PENN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALY is a StrongBuy and PENN is a Hold.
BALY | PENN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PENN's Valuation (47) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (52). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
PENN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (100). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
PENN's SMR Rating (97) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (99). This means that PENN’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
BALY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PENN (78). This means that BALY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.
BALY's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PENN (99). This means that BALY’s stock grew somewhat faster than PENN’s over the last 12 months.
| BALY | PENN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | 19 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BALY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PENN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BALY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PENN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BALY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PENN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BALY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PENN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BALY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while PENN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -6.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
BALY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PENN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.83% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AFGR | 38.10 | 0.17 | +0.44% |
| First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF (AFGR) | |||
| BKCH | 69.78 | -0.06 | -0.09% |
| Global X Blockchain ETF (BKCH) | |||
| IGOV | 39.65 | -0.12 | -0.30% |
| iShares International Treasury Bond ETF (IGOV) | |||
| REAI | 19.69 | -0.10 | -0.49% |
| Intelligent Real Estate ETF (REAI) | |||
| TACN | 28.08 | -0.30 | -1.04% |
| T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) | |||
BALY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BALY and INSE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BALY and INSE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BALY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALY | 100% | +1.68% | ||
| INSE - BALY | 32% Poorly correlated | +6.69% | ||
| HGV - BALY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.49% | ||
| PENN - BALY | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| MGM - BALY | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| MCRI - BALY | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
More | ||||
PENN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PENN has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PENN jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PENN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENN | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| INSE - PENN | 56% Loosely correlated | +6.69% | ||
| CZR - PENN | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| FLUT - PENN | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| VAC - PENN | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| DKNG - PENN | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
More | ||||