BAM
Price
$58.57
Change
-$1.73 (-2.87%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
PAX
Price
$11.97
Change
-$0.31 (-2.52%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs PAX

Header iconBAM vs PAX Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs PAXBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$58.57
Change-$1.73 (-2.87%)
Volume$2.42M
Capitalization16.34B
Patria Investments
Price$11.97
Change-$0.31 (-2.52%)
Volume$979.5K
Capitalization2.2B
BAM vs PAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. PAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and PAX is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $58.57 vs. PAX: $11.97)
Brand notoriety: BAM and PAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 181% vs. PAX: 174%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. PAX: $2.2B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. PAX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than PAX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAX’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while PAX (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

PAX is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than PAX($2.2B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than PAX: BAM (37.12) vs PAX (18.37). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 8.083 vs. PAX (2.923). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. PAX (143M). PAX has more cash in the bank: 12.8M vs. BAM (9M). PAX has less debt than BAM: PAX (15.6M) vs BAM (256M). BAM has higher revenues than PAX: BAM (383M) vs PAX (307M).
BAMPAXBAM / PAX
Capitalization16.3B2.2B741%
EBITDA522M143M365%
Gain YTD8.0832.923276%
P/E Ratio37.1218.37202%
Revenue383M307M125%
Total Cash9M12.8M70%
Total Debt256M15.6M1,641%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
52
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
31
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMPAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SINT5.310.51
+10.62%
SiNtx Technologies Inc.
FORA2.41-0.09
-3.66%
Forian
EXP224.18-8.75
-3.76%
Eagle Materials
DAVA26.02-2.28
-8.06%
Endava plc
ACCO4.56-0.96
-17.39%
Acco Brands Corp

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been loosely correlated with BK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
-2.52%
BK - PAX
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
CG - PAX
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
BN - PAX
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
SEIC - PAX
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
BAM - PAX
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
More