BAM
Price
$46.61
Change
+$0.91 (+1.99%)
Updated
Jun 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
73.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RPC
Price
$8.19
Change
-$0.08 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jun 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
905.37M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs RPC

Header iconBAM vs RPC Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs RPCBanner chart's image
BAM vs RPC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. RPC commentary
Jun 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and RPC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 12, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $45.70 vs. RPC: $8.27)
Brand notoriety: BAM and RPC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 98% vs. RPC: 64%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $73.06B vs. RPC: $905.37M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $73.06B. RPC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $905.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $156.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRPC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RPC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than RPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RPC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RPC is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while RPC (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

RPC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($73.1B) has a higher market cap than RPC($905M). RPC has higher P/E ratio than BAM: RPC (39.38) vs BAM (29.29). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -10.948 vs. RPC (-14.909). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.46B vs. RPC (94.4M). BAM has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. RPC (29M). RPC has less debt than BAM: RPC (404M) vs BAM (3.83B). BAM has higher revenues than RPC: BAM (4.77B) vs RPC (305M).
BAMRPCBAM / RPC
Capitalization73.1B905M8,077%
EBITDA3.46B94.4M3,663%
Gain YTD-10.948-14.90973%
P/E Ratio29.2939.3874%
Revenue4.77B305M1,564%
Total Cash1.1B29M3,779%
Total Debt3.83B404M947%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs RPC: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
RPC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5765
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
3282
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5048

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RPC (92) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than RPC’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RPC (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to RPC’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPC (82) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPC’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as RPC (60) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to RPC’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as RPC (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to RPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMRPC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDGRX56.36N/A
N/A
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
BPLSX16.32N/A
N/A
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
FDESX42.77N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock O
CIPMX19.14N/A
N/A
Champlain Mid Cap Adv
RSQCX15.16-0.07
-0.46%
Royce Small-Cap Special Equity Consult

RPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPC has been loosely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPC jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RPC
1D Price
Change %
RPC100%
N/A
KKR - RPC
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
BX - RPC
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
STEP - RPC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
ARES - RPC
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
BAM - RPC
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.08%
More