The Stochastic Oscillator for BAM moved out of overbought territory on October 13, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 62 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 43 of the 62 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 69%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BAM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 66%.
The Aroon Indicator for BAM entered a downward trend on October 07, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BAM's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BAM as a result. In 49 of 84 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BAM just turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where BAM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +3.10% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BAM advanced for three days, in 191 of 322 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 59%.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 29 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. BAM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 78 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: BAM's P/B Ratio (9.765) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.375). P/E Ratio (26.246) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-4.519). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.046) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.044) settles around the average of (0.272) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (15.198) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. BAM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
RPC moved above its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 32 of 45 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on RPC as a result. In 62 of 90 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for RPC just turned positive on October 05, 2026. Looking at past instances where RPC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
Following a +3.39% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where RPC advanced for three days, in 199 of 282 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
RPC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrated that the stock has entered the overbought zone. This may point to a price pull-back soon.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where RPC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
The Aroon Indicator for RPC entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. RPC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.565) is normal, around the industry mean (2.375). P/E Ratio (34.200) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-4.519). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.654) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.272) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.978) is also within normal values, averaging (15.798).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. RPC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
BAM | RPC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BAM's Valuation (94) in the null industry is in the same range as RPC (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to RPC’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RPC (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to RPC’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPC (77) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPC’s over the last 12 months.
RPC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as BAM (68) in the null industry. This means that RPC’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as RPC (93) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to RPC’s over the last 12 months.
| BAM | RPC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 69% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RPC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while RPC (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.58%.
BAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
RPC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPC has been loosely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPC jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RPC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPC | 100% | +2.40% | ||
| KKR - RPC | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
| ARES - RPC | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| BX - RPC | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| STEP - RPC | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| BAM - RPC | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||