BAM
Price
$58.27
Change
-$0.74 (-1.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
94.32B
VINP
Price
$10.16
Change
+$0.12 (+1.20%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
641.93M
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs VINP

Header iconBAM vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs VINPBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$58.27
Change-$0.74 (-1.25%)
Volume$3.91M
Capitalization94.32B
Vinci Compass Investments
Price$10.16
Change+$0.12 (+1.20%)
Volume$282
Capitalization641.93M
BAM vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. VINP commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and VINP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $58.27 vs. VINP: $10.04)
Brand notoriety: BAM and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 211% vs. VINP: 69%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $94.32B vs. VINP: $641.93M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $94.32B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $641.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than VINP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.14% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

VINP is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($94.3B) has a higher market cap than VINP($642M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than VINP: BAM (41.27) vs VINP (20.65). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 10.022 vs. VINP (4.415). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 970M vs. VINP (332M). VINP has higher revenues than BAM: VINP (910M) vs BAM (835M).
BAMVINPBAM / VINP
Capitalization94.3B642M14,688%
EBITDA970M332M292%
Gain YTD10.0224.415227%
P/E Ratio41.2720.65200%
Revenue835M910M92%
Total Cash12MN/A-
Total Debt639MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCSE14.130.17
+1.18%
Franklin Sustainable Intl Eq ETF
JHEM30.260.29
+0.98%
JHancock Multifactor Em Mkts ETF
ETHO63.390.24
+0.38%
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
VDC220.350.66
+0.30%
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
BRIF28.590.08
+0.27%
FIS Bright Portfolios Focused Equity ETF

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
+1.21%
PAX - VINP
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
BN - VINP
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
SEIC - VINP
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
TROW - VINP
55%
Loosely correlated
+5.84%
BAM - VINP
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More